In this article, we will dig into the which advanced photo editor, you should choose: Photoshop vs Affinity Photo. It is not a direct head to head comparing of the two applications though. We will look more on what you would miss if you were to chose Affinity Photo instead of Photoshop. I think this is where most photographers are. Can we manage with having “just” Affinity Photo, and not Photoshop?
Most of the questions I get as a photographer is about post-processing, even from non-photographers. The first question I often hear is: You use Photoshop, right?
Many are surprised, when I answer, well yes and no. I use Photoshop and Lightroom for an In-house Photographer job I have, next to running Photography-RAW. I use Capture One Pro 12 and Affinity Photo, Nik Collection for my landscape and nature photography, plus for private photos. That is also why I can create and suggest Photoshop Actions to Photoshop users and macros to Affinity Photo users. I use both quite a lot.
What are the Main Differences at a Glance Between Affinity Photo vs. Photoshop:
- Affinity Photo is a low one-time payment
- Resize with the move tool
- Saves undo history even after closing
- Live brush preview
- Works on both desktop and iPad
- Workspace divided into personas, which is slightly more user-friendly
- Photoshop is subscription-based
- Faster with big files
- More 3rd party plugins available
- Scripting possible
- Photoshop actions more capable than Affinity Macros
- More tools in the Creative Cloud Suite than in Affinity’s “Suite”.
The Photoshop vs Affinity Photo Battle
Affinity Photo is probably the photo editor that comes closest to being able to battle Photoshop in terms of functionality.
I have been using Affinity Photo for over 1½ years now, and to cut things short I don’t look back with longing to the Photoshop days. That is not to say that Affinity Photo is better than Photoshop.
To be honest, Affinity Photo lacks a few features, but most of these features are not even used by the majority of Photoshop users. So from that perspective, it is more than capable for replacing Photoshop.
Often, photographers refer to the 5% features that Affinity Photo lacks, as a reason for not trying it. But for most photographers, Affinity Photo can do 95% of what they could ever wish for in an advanced photo editor. And on some points even better than Photoshop, and at a fraction of the price.
Many both enthusiast photographers and even professional photographers don’t use the full features available in Photoshop. Instead, they rely on the same basic workflow or “recipe” that they have found to work for them for processing most of
They will stick to this “recipe” or workflow for 95% of their images.
So what it all comes down to is whether you can build a solid photo editing workflow in Affinity Photo, that gives reliable results. Let us look at some of the areas where Affinity Photo is different from Photoshop and where it can take a little getting used to when going from Photoshop to Affinity Photo.
Differences in workflow: Photoshop vs Affinity Photo
The main questions when switching from using Photoshop to an alternative, like Affinity Photo, are:
How will this affect my photo editing workflow? Do I have to start from scratch and learn everything again? Where are the differences? Will photo editing become faster or slower?
To answer the last question first. I don’t think that anybody uses Photoshop for a fast workflow. They use it because it is an extremely powerful photo editor. This is the same for Affinity Photo. Your workflow will not become faster, and it will not get slower either. However, you get a very powerful photo editor, just like Photoshop.
The logic behind Affinity Photo is just the same as Photoshop, however, you might have to look for a few things in other places, even though 95% of the features and menu items will be in the same spot in the top menu.
The right side panels are also very much like those you find in Photoshop. You have the layers panel, history panel, adjustments panel and all the other things you already know from Photoshop. Working with masks and selections is also almost the same as in photoshop
The adjustment panel in Affinity Photo takes up a bit more of the user interface in the right side, but many of the adjustment layers you can add are the same as in Photoshop and with similar options for each adjustment layer.
Affinity Photo’s User Interface Is Divided Into Workspaces
One of the differences you will notice is that Affinity Photo is divided into personas or workspaces, that is accessible through buttons at the top bar.
The difference personas group related features together and only shows it when you need it. For instance, the export and slicing features are only visible from the Export persona, and not when you are just editing an image.
This makes the interface slightly less cluttered and a little more user friendly than Photoshop.
Photoshop also has workspaces, but from a normal user’s point of view, you don’t often switch between them as part of your standard workflow in Photoshop.
When first opening a RAW image, Affinity Photo will open up in the Develop persona. This is equivalent to Adobe Camera Raw.
Just like working in Adobe Camera Raw, keep your edits in the Develop Persona to basic exposure corrections and for preparing your Raw file for further enhancements.
When you press the Develop button you are taken to the Photo persona, which is where you will do most of the enhancements like adding adjustment layers, working with advanced selections and applying filters.
Integrating Affinity Photo With Other Apps
Integration with image library applications like Lightroom, Luminar, Capture One Pro or ON1 Photo RAW is quite easy. For instance, in Lightroom just select the image you want to edit, right-click and select Edit In… and select Affinity Photo. Just like you would if you wanted to take your image to Photoshop.
There are a few issues to be aware of for Lightroom users. You cannot open multiple images as layers in Affinity Photo. If you need to open multiple images as layers you need to do this manually, by opening all of the images and copy the layers each image into a single image with all the layers.
Using Affinity Photo With Your Photoshop Plugins
There’s a big chance that you can continue to use most of the Photoshop plugins you own as Affinity Photo supports Photoshop plugins. Older plugins like Nik Collection Plugins can only be installed by using a workaround, but it is doable. The new version of Nik Collection from DXO supports Affinity Photo.
Once installed most plugins work without issues, but with the difference that you apply the plugin effect to the active layer, and not to a new layer, as you might be used to in Photoshop. At least this is the case with Nik Collection plugins.
If you just adjust your workflow and duplicate the active layer before using the plugin, you will feel barely feel a difference.
Photoshop Actions vs Affinity Photo Macros
If you are used to using Photoshop actions in your workflow you will be happy to know that Affinity Photo also supports saving a series of steps into a workflow.
In Affinity Photo, this is called macros instead of actions. However, you cannot import your existing photoshop actions into Affinity Photo.
You have to build your own macros or get some of the free macros or the few paid macro packages available.
There are still some limitations to what you can record as macros (in Affinity Photo v. 1.6.7), even though it is a valuable feature in Affinity Photo for many photographers.
Affinity Photo Focus Stacking and Panorama Stitching Could Be Improved
From a macro photographer’s viewpoint, focus stacking could be improved, as it is not quite up to speed. For instance, Affinity Photo doesn’t show the layer masks and which part from each layer was used to create the focus stack, but only outputs the resulting layer. So you cannot easily finish the blend yourself.
The panorama feature suffers from the same failure to show a layer mask of which part of each image layer was used to create the panorama, so you can add finishing touches to the panorama stitching yourself. You have to do this in the stitching process and cannot edit it after you applied the Panorama stitch to a pixel layer.
I must admit though that the initial panorama results that Affinity Photo outputs, is often much better than the results I got from Photoshop.
Luminosity Masks vs. Blend Ranges
Another feature that you might miss, if you are used to working in Photoshop, is the lack of ability to use luminosity masks in Affinity Photo. Well, you can actually create luminosity masks, but it is even more complicated than in Photoshop, where it is also a quite complex process. So if you prefer manual exposure blending over the more automatic HDR merge feature in Affinity Photo, you need to change your workflow a bit.
Instead of using luminosity masks, Affinity Photo relies on using blend ranges for blending images and limiting adjustment layers to only affect pixels with a particular luminosity value.
Blend ranges are like Photoshops Blend-if feature but on steroids. It is extremely powerful, but you still need to get used to working with it.
By using blend ranges you can set how a layer or adjustment layer should blend with the underlying layers. In the above example, you can see the blend range options for a saturation adjustment layer. The highlights will not be affected by the saturation adjustment layer, because the curve point that controls the highlights/whites is pulled down to 0% blending at the far right.
At least for landscape photographers using blend ranges instead of luminosity masks, is one of the major changes in workflow to get used to.
Why you might not be ready to switch from Photoshop to Affinity Photo
- You can do more with Photoshop actions than you can with Affinity Photo macros. It is not that the macros feature in Affinity Photo is terrible. Macros are a great help in Affinity Photo, and you can do a lot of things with them. But the macro tool doesn’t support all the things that you can do in Affinity Photo. This means that you cannot records every step of a technique you might want to put into a macro to automate your workflow. In Photoshop a lot more, if not all features of Photoshop can be recorded into actions. When it comes to automating Photoshop vs. Affinity Photo, Photoshop is still a clear winner.
- While Affinity Photo is quite capable and fast, there are times where it lags in terms of speed. Especially for high-demanding photo editing tasks, it shows a bit of slowness compared to Photoshop.
- There are a lot more tutorials and video courses available for Photoshop that there is for Affinity Photo. However, you can discuss if you need 100 tutorials or videos teaching you how to dodge and burn. There are excellent resources available for Affinity Photo, and maybe it is enough for you. One of the few video courses available for Affinity Photo is available here on Photography-RAW.
- You might not be ready to switch away from your other design tools, which are part of the Creative Cloud. Even though Affinity Designer can replace Adobe Illustrator and Affinity Publisher tries to replace Adobe InDesign, these apps are newer and might not have the functionality you need. Furthermore, the Adobe Creative Cloud Full package includes a lot for apps, like Dreamweaver, or Premiere PRO, that you might still need.
- There are more Photoshop plugins available and custom panels that you can use to extend PS. Scripting is also not available in Affinity Photo yet.
Reasons why you would want to go for Affinity Photo
- One of the primary reasons for choosing Affinity Photo vs. Photoshop is that you get almost the same for a lot less.
- Most photo editing tools only work in raster formats. However, you can also create vector shapes in Affinity Photo by using the pen/node tools or the shape tool.
- Affinity Photo has a live brush preview. This allows you to see the effect of brush strokes before you apply them. This is very useful for photographers. Especially when creating masks or dodge and burning using the brush tool.
- You can resize your image with the Move tool in Affinity Photo. In Photoshop, you need to use Resize Image from the menu. Using the move tool to resize is both flexible and more intuitive.
- Affinity Photo saves your undo history even after you close the image. It saves the undo history with the image. This means that you can revert to any undo stages no matter where in the editing process you are.
- Affinity Photo works on both Desktop and iPad (even though you have to buy a separate license for the iPad version). There is a Photoshop version for iPad, but it is not nearly as good and doesn’t include all the things you can do in Photoshop. The iPad version of Affinity Photo lets you work on native files (.psd). If you regularly work on several devices, Affinity Photo is a great choice.
Photoshop vs Affinity Photo: Is it worth the switch?
Despite these few lacks that might be crucial to some photographers, Affinity Photo is more than capable of taking over for the editing needs for the majority of Photoshop users.
If you are like most photographers you will edit 80% of your images directly in applications like Lightroom or similar, and will only edit a few of your images in Photoshop.
From what I hear from other photographers, it is not actually a matter of whether they are attached to Photoshop. They would love a similar and cheaper alternative that could give them the same professionally looking results.
However, they haven’t found a qualified alternative to Lightroom yet. And since Photoshop and Lightroom are bundled together into a single subscription, it doesn’t make sense for them to switch from Photoshop to something else. Instead, many photographers stick to their pricey subscription with Adobe.
I wonder if this will change when more and more photographers begin the explore the growing number of capable image management applications in the market, like On1 Photo RAW, Luminar and Capture One.
Coupled with Affinity Photo for your more advanced image editing needs, you might soon be ready to loosen yourself from the grip of Adobe.
What’s your experience of using Affinity Photo vs Photoshop?