Post-Processing » Affinity Photo vs Photoshop 2020: which should you choose?

Affinity Photo vs Photoshop 2020: which should you choose?

Download a FREE e-book: 25 Techniques All Photographers Should Master

In this article, we will dig into the which advanced photo editor, you should choose: Photoshop vs Affinity Photo. It is not a direct head to head comparison of the two applications though. We will look more at what you would miss if you were to chose Affinity Photo instead of Photoshop. I think this is where most photographers are. Can we manage with having “just” Affinity Photo, and not Photoshop?

Most of the questions I get as a photographer is about post-processing, even from non-photographers. The first question I often hear is: You use Photoshop, right?

Many are surprised, when I answer, well yes and no. I use Photoshop and Lightroom for an In-house Photographer job I have, next to running Photography-RAW. I use Capture One Pro 20 and Affinity Photo, Nik Collection for my landscape and nature photography, plus for private photos. That is also why I can create and suggest Photoshop Actions to Photoshop users and macros to Affinity Photo users. I use both quite a lot.

What are the Main Differences at a Glance Between Affinity Photo vs. Photoshop:

Affinity Photo: 

  • Affinity Photo is a low one-time payment
  • Resize with the move tool
  • Saves undo history even after closing
  • Live brush preview
  • Workspace divided into personas, which is slightly more user-friendly


  • Photoshop is subscription-based
  • Faster with big files
  • More 3rd party plugins available
  • Scripting possible
  • Photoshop actions more capable than Affinity Macros
  • Comes bundled with Lightroom
  • More tools in the Creative Cloud Suite than in Affinity’s “Suite”.

Let us begin by looking at the price difference and whether they can justify the difference in price

How much does Affinity Photo Cost?

You can get Affinity Photo from the Mac App Store / Microsoft Store in Windows 10, or you can download it directly from Serif’s website for a one-time price of $49.99.

If you also want the iPad version of Affinity Photo is costs you $20.

How much does Photoshop CC Cost?

Photoshop is subscription-based and comes with Lightroom at a monthly price of $9.99, which is the cheapest option. If you just want Photoshop as a Creative Cloud subscription the price changes to $20.99. In the 2020 version of Photoshop, the iPad version is included in the monthly subscription.

As you can see the price difference is quite huge.

For comparison, if you were to buy both Affinity Photo for Mac + iPad you would look at a total price of $69.99. I bought Affinity Photo from version 1.5, and three years later, I haven’t been asked to pay for any upgrades.

One year of subscription to Adobe’s Creative Cloud Photography plan would be approx. $120. Two years of subscription would be $240 and three years would be $360.

Over three years’ time, you would pay roughly $290 for the extra features in Photoshop plus Lightroom. I actually don’t mind paying a subscription for an app, but then I would prefer to choose the app myself. For instance, I think that Capture One has a lot of advantages over Lightroom.

The Photoshop vs Affinity Photo Battle

Affinity Photo is probably the photo editor that comes closest to being able to battle Photoshop in terms of functionality.

I have been using Affinity Photo for over 1½ years now, and to cut things short I don’t look back with longing to the Photoshop days. That is not to say that Affinity Photo is better than Photoshop.

To be honest, Affinity Photo lacks a few features, but most of these features are not even used by the majority of Photoshop users. So from that perspective, it is more than capable for replacing Photoshop.

Often, photographers refer to the 5% features that Affinity Photo lacks, as a reason for not trying it. But for most photographers, Affinity Photo can do 95% of what they could ever wish for in an advanced photo editor. And on some points even better than Photoshop, and at a fraction of the price.

Many both enthusiast photographers and even professional photographers don’t use the full features available in Photoshop. Instead, they rely on the same basic workflow or “recipe” that they have found to work for them for processing most of their images. And often it is not that complex.

They will stick to this “recipe” or workflow for 95% of their images.

So what it all comes down to is whether you can build a solid photo editing workflow in Affinity Photo, that gives reliable results. Let us look at some of the areas where Affinity Photo is different from Photoshop and where it can take a little getting used to when going from Photoshop to Affinity Photo.

Affinity Photo vs Photoshop
Affinity Photo vs Photoshop: The user interface is 95% identical, so you will quickly learn the robes with with Affinity Photo

Differences in Workflow: Photoshop vs Affinity Photo

The main questions when switching from using Photoshop to an alternative, like Affinity Photo, are:

How will this affect my photo editing workflow? Do I have to start from scratch and learn everything again? Where are the differences? Will photo editing become faster or slower?

To answer the last question first.  I don’t think that anybody uses Photoshop for a fast workflow. They use it because it is an extremely powerful photo editor. This is the same for Affinity Photo. Your workflow will not become faster, and it will not get slower either. However, you get a very powerful photo editor, just like Photoshop.

The logic behind Affinity Photo is just the same as Photoshop, however, you might have to look for a few things in other places, even though 95% of the features and menu items will be in the same spot in the top menu.

The right side panels are also very much like those you find in Photoshop. You have the layers panel, history panel, adjustments panel and all the other things you already know from Photoshop. Working with masks and selections is also almost the same as in photoshop

Adjustment Layer Panel in Affinity Photo

The adjustment panel in Affinity Photo takes up a bit more of the user interface in the right side, but many of the adjustment layers you can add are the same as in Photoshop and with similar options for each adjustment layer.

Affinity Photo’s User Interface Is Divided Into Workspaces

One of the differences you will notice is that Affinity Photo is divided into personas or workspaces, that is accessible through buttons at the top bar.

Affinity Photo Persona Buttons

The difference personas group related features together and only shows it when you need it. For instance, the export and slicing features are only visible from the Export persona, and not when you are just editing an image.

This makes the interface slightly less cluttered and a little more user friendly than Photoshop.

Photoshop also has workspaces, but from a normal user’s point of view, you don’t often switch between them as part of your standard workflow in Photoshop.

When first opening a RAW image, Affinity Photo will open up in the Develop persona. This is equivalent to Adobe Camera Raw.

Develop persona equals to Adobe Camera RAW

Just like working in Adobe Camera Raw, keep your edits in the Develop Persona to basic exposure corrections and for preparing your Raw file for further enhancements.

When you press the Develop button you are taken to the Photo persona, which is where you will do most of the enhancements like adding adjustment layers, working with advanced selections and applying filters.

Integrating Affinity Photo With Other Apps

Integration with image library applications like Lightroom, Luminar, Capture One Pro or ON1 Photo RAW is quite easy. For instance, in Lightroom just select the image you want to edit, right-click and select Edit In… and select Affinity Photo. Just like you would if you wanted to take your image to Photoshop.

Affinity Photo integrates well with other digital asset management  apps

There are a few issues to be aware of for Lightroom users. You cannot open multiple images as layers in Affinity Photo. If you need to open multiple images as layers you need to do this manually, by opening all of the images and copy the layers each image into a single image with all the layers.

Using Affinity Photo With Your Photoshop Plugins

There’s a big chance that you can continue to use most of the Photoshop plugins you own as Affinity Photo supports Photoshop plugins. Older plugins like Nik Collection Plugins can only be installed by using a workaround, but it is doable. The new version of Nik Collection from DXO supports Affinity Photo.

Once installed most plugins work without issues, but with the difference that you apply the plugin effect to the active layer, and not to a new layer, as you might be used to in Photoshop. At least this is the case with Nik Collection plugins.

If you just adjust your workflow and duplicate the active layer before using the plugin, you will feel barely feel a difference.

Photoshop Actions vs Affinity Photo Macros

Affinity Photo Macros vs Photoshop Actions

If you are used to using Photoshop actions in your workflow you will be happy to know that Affinity Photo also supports saving a series of steps into a workflow.

In Affinity Photo, this is called macros instead of actions. However, you cannot import your existing photoshop actions into Affinity Photo.

You have to build your own macros or get some of the free macros or the few paid macro packages available.

There are still some limitations to what you can record as macros (in Affinity Photo v. 1.6.7), but still a valuable feature in Affinity Photo for many photographers.

Affinity Photo Focus Stacking and Panorama Stitching Could Be Improved

From a macro photographer’s viewpoint, focus stacking could be improved, as it is not quite up to speed. For instance, Affinity Photo doesn’t show the layer masks and which part from each layer was used to create the focus stack, but only outputs the resulting layer. So you cannot easily finish the blend yourself.

The panorama feature suffers from the same failure to show a layer mask of which part of each image layer was used to create the panorama, so you can add finishing touches to the panorama stitching yourself. You have to do this in the stitching process and cannot edit it after you applied the Panorama stitch to a pixel layer.

I must admit though that the initial panorama results that Affinity Photo outputs, is often much better than the results I got from Photoshop.

Panorama stitching in Affinity Photo

Luminosity Masks vs. Blend Ranges

Another feature that you might miss, if you are used to working in Photoshop, is the lack of ability to use luminosity masks in Affinity Photo. Well, you can actually create luminosity masks, but it is even more complicated than in Photoshop, where it is also a quite complex process. So if you prefer manual exposure blending over the more automatic HDR merge feature in Affinity Photo, you need to change your workflow a bit.

Instead of using luminosity masks, Affinity Photo relies on using blend ranges for blending images and limiting adjustment layers to only affect pixels with a particular luminosity value.

Blend ranges are like Photoshops Blend-if feature but on steroids. It is extremely powerful, but you still need to get used to working with it.

Affinity Photo uses blend ranges instead of the traditional difficult luminosity masks in Photoshop

By using blend ranges you can set how a layer or adjustment layer should blend with the underlying layers. In the above example, you can see the blend range options for a saturation adjustment layer. The highlights will not be affected by the saturation adjustment layer, because the curve point that controls the highlights/whites is pulled down to 0% blending at the far right.

At least for landscape photographers using blend ranges instead of luminosity masks, is one of the major changes in workflow to get used to.

Can you use Photoshop Brushes in Affinity Photo?

Yes, you can import and use Photoshop brushes in Affinity Photo. There are a few settings and features that are not available with brushes in Affinity Photo, but it is possible to import both your own brushes or professional brushes that you bought online. In the video below, you can see how to import brushes (1:20 mins. into the video), and get a short explanation on some missing brush features in Affinity Photo.

Can you open Photoshop files (.PSD) in Affinity Photo?

You can both open .psd files in Affinity Photo. You can also choose to save your work in .psd. This is quite useful, if you need to send your files to a colleague or a friend who doesn’t have Affinity Photo. Photoshop doens’t know how to read Affinity Photo’s .afphoto files.

What Is The Best Photo Library Manager to Use with Affinity Photo?

This is where it gets really tough because there are a dozen of opinions about what’s best. I guess since, you have made it this far, you are not completely happy with the Lightroom/Photoshop bundle. If you don’t mind a pricy subscription the best RAW developer with library management built-in is probably Capture One Pro. Capture One is made with professionals in mind, both in terms of functionality and its price. If you don’t want to spend that much, On1 Photo RAW is a good alternative. It plays well together with Affinity Photo, Nik Collection. I used it for half a year before settling on Capture One.

Why you might not be ready to switch from Photoshop to Affinity Photo

  • You can do more with Photoshop actions than you can with Affinity Photo macros. It is not that the macros feature in Affinity Photo is terrible. Macros are a great help in Affinity Photo, and you can do a lot of things with them. But the macro tool doesn’t support all the things that you can do in Affinity Photo. This means that you cannot records every step of a technique you might want to put into a macro to automate your workflow. In Photoshop a lot more, if not all features of Photoshop can be recorded into actions. When it comes to automating Photoshop vs. Affinity Photo, Photoshop is still a clear winner.
  • While Affinity Photo is quite capable and fast, there are times where it lags in terms of speed. Especially for high-demanding photo editing tasks, it shows a bit of slowness compared to Photoshop.
  • There are a lot more tutorials and video courses available for Photoshop that there is for Affinity Photo. However, you can discuss if you need 100 tutorials or videos teaching you how to dodge and burn. There are excellent resources available for Affinity Photo, and maybe it is enough for you. One of the few video courses available for Affinity Photo is available here on Photography-RAW.
  • You might not be ready to switch away from your other design tools, which are part of the Creative Cloud. Even though Affinity Designer can replace Adobe Illustrator and Affinity Publisher tries to replace Adobe InDesign, these apps are newer and might not have the functionality you need. Furthermore, the Adobe Creative Cloud Full package includes a lot for apps, like Dreamweaver, or Premiere PRO, that you might still need.
  • There are more Photoshop plugins available and custom panels that you can use to extend PS. Scripting is also not available in Affinity Photo yet.

Reasons why you would want to go for Affinity Photo

  • One of the primary reasons for choosing Affinity Photo vs. Photoshop is that you get almost the same for a lot less. 
  • Most photo editing tools only work in raster formats. However, you can also create vector shapes in Affinity Photo by using the pen/node tools or the shape tool.
  • Affinity Photo has a live brush preview. This allows you to see the effect of brush strokes before you apply them. This is very useful for photographers. Especially when creating masks or dodge and burning using the brush tool.
  • You can resize your image with the Move tool in Affinity Photo. In Photoshop, you need to use Resize Image from the menu. Using the move tool to resize is both flexible and more intuitive.
  • Affinity Photo saves your undo history even after you close the image. It saves the undo history with the image. This means that you can revert to any undo stages no matter where in the editing process you are.
  • Affinity Photo works on both Desktop and iPad (even though you have to buy a separate license for the iPad version). There is a Photoshop version for iPad, but it is not nearly as good and doesn’t include all the things you can do in Photoshop. The iPad version of Affinity Photo lets you work on native files (.psd). If you regularly work on several devices, Affinity Photo is a great choice. 

Photoshop vs Affinity Photo

Photoshop vs Affinity Photo: Is it worth the switch?

Despite these few lacks that might be crucial to some photographers, Affinity Photo is more than capable of taking over for the editing needs for the majority of Photoshop users.

If you are like most photographers you will edit 80% of your images directly in applications like Lightroom or similar, and will only edit a few of your images in Photoshop.

From what I hear from other photographers, it is not actually a matter of whether they are attached to Photoshop. They would love a similar and cheaper alternative that could give them the same professionally looking results.

However, they haven’t found a qualified alternative to Lightroom yet. And since Photoshop and Lightroom are bundled together into a single subscription, it doesn’t make sense for them to switch from Photoshop to something else. Instead, many photographers stick to their pricey subscription with Adobe.

I wonder if this will change when more and more photographers begin the explore the growing number of capable image management applications in the market, like On1 Photo RAW, Luminar and Capture One.

Coupled with Affinity Photo for your more advanced image editing needs, you might soon be ready to loosen yourself from the grip of Adobe.

What’s your experience of using Affinity Photo vs Photoshop?

  • Latest Posts
Author Details
Hey I’m Peter. I’m the owner and editor of Photography-RAW. I make sure that you get the best articles about photography. Personally, I prefer to shoot landscape, nature and macro photography. I hope you enjoy the site 🙂
Hey I’m Peter. I’m the owner and editor of Photography-RAW. I make sure that you get the best articles about photography. Personally, I prefer to shoot landscape, nature and macro photography. I hope you enjoy the site 🙂
Latest Posts
  • Affinity Photo Review

34 thoughts on “Affinity Photo vs Photoshop 2020: which should you choose?”

  1. My own “journey” was from Apple’s Aperture into Capture One Pro. Initially I was using the free Capture One that came with my Sony but paid for the upgrade. Then, I got stung because a new version came out and the upgrade price was the same as an annual subscription to Photoshop.
    Capture One lacks much compared to other products – for example you can’t put a border round a print.
    Then I noticed Affinity and decided to give that a try. Yes, it’s substantially cheaper than either alternative and it does all that I’ve wanted to do in the last six months, however ….
    There’s a marked lack in support material – Serif have a number of videos, several independent people post material but it’s nothing compared to what’s available for Adobe. Serif have published a Workbook and much as I like that it’s just one English language publication.
    Overall I’m pretty pleased with the combination I have – Fast RAW Viewer, Capture One and Affinity but I’m left with the feeling that sooner or later I’ll want to make the jump to Photoshop and perhaps I’m wasting my time now trying to lear Affinity.

    • Hi Jeff,
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
      It is true that there are not as many videos and tutorials about using Affinity Photo. On the other hand, there are almost too many tutorials about Photoshop. Sometimes it confuses more than it benefits to have a very wide choice of tutorials.

      In my opinion, what matters is to get the basic editing workflow right. However, because of the tutorials available it can be diffucult to find out what it is exactly you need to learn to process an image from start to finish (from importing it until making it ready for print). This is what I teach in the video course available here in the website.

      If you watch/read the individual videos/articles on the web, it will not benefit much, no matter whether it is for Photoshop or Affinity Photo, if it is not placed into a workflow context.

      Anyway, thanks for commenting, always appreciated.

    • I have a similar “Journey.” I moved from Apple’s Aperture to Capture One because I did not want to go to a subscription model and Capture One is used by a lot of pros. I was using PC most of the time and had a license for Corel Photo Paint which did the few things I needed that Capture One can’t do. But in the last year I’ve gone all Mac and Corel makes me pay a fairly large sum to convert to Mac so I tired Affinity Pro and am satisfied with the results.

      Insightful comments are in this article. Including 80% of work can be done in Lightroon or Capture One and only 20% of the time do you need to use a photo editor. I agree with that. However I’m not sure about the comment of not finding a good alternative to Lightroom. I’ve never tried Lightroom but my understanding is Capture One covers much of what Lightroom does and some things better than Lightroom. This begs the question have you done a Lightroom vs. Caputure One comparison? I’d like to read your thoughts on that.

  2. I’ve spent much more time learning Affinity Photo than PS and it’s proved easier to find a way round different tasks. With Lightroom being my main editing format, the need to complete a workflow always requires extra help and so far AF has gelled effectively. The problems I’ve encountered have only been solved through the generosity of the members of the Affinity Forum. Of the many questions needing an answer this has been the only place offering sufficient feedback to stop me giving up. Recently I set about teaching myself composing skills and AF proved effective and less complicated than PS however, with my next project of digging deeper into B&W editing, the lack of luminosity masking is proving challenging. Despite the issues mentioned I have no plans to move away from AF and Serif are to be praised for offering a non subscription, excellent alternative to the unreasonable, costly and ongoing monthly fee; they have needed a challenger for a long time.

  3. Hi Peter,

    I’ve been working with Affinity for a while and have found it excellent for more in-depth re-touching. Frequency separation world really well and Affinity in-painting brush tool is awesome.

    I’m frustrated that Nik layers are essentially locked after use in Affinity… There is no way to apply them as live filters. In PS if you make the base image a Smart object, the Nik layers can be re-opened and Adjusted. This flexibility is huge for me and a feature that Serif really need to address.

    • I agree with the “locked” comment it is a major problem for me, I need a live filters so PS is my go to app with the “Robin Hood” .

  4. Lack of competition leads to arrogance. And greed.
    • Price – Photoshop charging on time interval basis is based on corporate greed. This is founded upon Adobe’s confidence that it is invincible. Likewise, Kodak once upon a time felt it was invincible in the world of photographic film manufacture. What happened to Kodak has some lessons for Adobe.
    • Pirate versions of Photoshop CC – Is Adobe even aware that out there in the real world, there are copies of pirated Photoshop CC that have been cracked and used, without the users having to pay a cent to Adobe? If Adobe had not resorted to scalping its customers every month, some of those pirate copy users may have been happy to buy a one-time payment of Photoshop (which Adobe used to do a long time ago).
    • Terribly User Unfriendly – With each iteration Adobe Photoshop gets more unfriendly and mind numbing complex to use. It is the outcome of low quality programming, that does not respect the customer.

    • The price for photographers bundle that adobe offers is WAY cheaper than most alternatives. You spend the same for ps and lr as you would for on1 and it’s half the price of capture 1

      I’m not saying the adobe products are better. But citing the subscription fee as a reason to avoid them is short sighted. They’re cheaper in the long run and are paid in monthly installments. And I’m a guy who HATES app subscriptions.

        • I just had to say…YES! You are so right on..i too have LR 6 and Photoshop cs6ext and i use it as well as affinity….i just had to let you know…how right you are!

  5. You forgot one thing Adobe Bridge. You can open RAW files from Bridge straight to Affinity Photo. Just don’t click open in ‘Camera Raw’ just click on open. The file will open in the Develop Persona. I use Windows 10 and set it up so Raw Files will open in Affinity photo by default. I use Bridge to Label and Rate my photos. However Bridge don’t open other files such as Jpegs and Tiffs only Raw files.

  6. I am an artist and paint with oil paints. I was looking into buying photoshop for 2 reasons: 1) to make prints of my paintings. I take a photo or have my paintings scanned then adjust colors and contrast with photoshop and then make a print to sell.
    2) To draw ad paint with photoshop and ultimately give up actual paint, brushes and chemicals like turpentine. I might be slowly developing allergy to turpentine.
    In your opinion, will Affinity do the above?Thanks for all the help and guidance you provide.

    • As a painter, maybe give Corel painter a look as well, I got the whole suite on humble for $25, and it is made with the physical artist in mind.

  7. Hi
    I bought 6 months ago Capture One 12 (over 500$cdn) mostly for landscape. I use it very often after replacing skies in Luminar 4. I also use ON1 2020 (adding “Plus 49.95$/year) for their best tutorials in ON1 and for general photography and luminosity mask . I also own a version of PS CS5 educational that I use rarely. I also use version 6.14 of lightroom for printing only on canvas. Like you I also use DXO Photolabs 3 (PRIME) +DXO Nikk plugins for landscape and particularly with my Nikon DX cameras. I shoot mostly with a Nikon D800 + Fuji X-T2 (14mm F2.8)
    Here are my questions:
    1- How would you rate Affinity Photo raw converter ? Please compare it to C1; DXo; LR;etc.
    2- Capture one is the fastest and best ‘jpeg” converter’ (raw-jpg), while ON1 is very slow in translating fron RAW to jpg. What are your comments on my statement ?
    3- I love LR 6.14 for editing, but I stopped using it, because I messed up my catalogs quite a few time, loosing hundreds of “Collections” ending with zero files showing on each. Is this a problem, that is currently happening to many users ? (my files are in directories, located on a different drive than LR). (windows 10 pro)

    • I currently use Luminar 4 (only) . I was thinking of Aurora or Affinity Photo . I shoot mainly portraits, fitness mainly including muscles, hence wanting that ‘extra’ detail/edge’ . Would you have a preferrence or recommendation to either of these options? Staying away from Adobe.

  8. I’m not sure if this is available in the latest version of Photoshop but Affinity Photo also has live filter layers where you can apply filters in a non destructive way and you can even adjust them later like adjustments layers.

  9. Great comparison, I have been looking to move away from my Adobe subscription and save myself some cash.

    I mostly do stuff for web design, which often includes logo work and modding and touching up various images, I have just DL’d the 90 day trial of Affinity Photo, Affinity Designer and Affinity Publisher, which are currently all on 50% discount so I a very tempted just to get the anyway.

    After reading a few comments and reviews like this one I am very hopeful that the Affinity products will work for me as I am one of those users that likely never uses that 5% extra that the Adobe products are able to do, heck I don’t even know what they are.

    Thanks for the insights.

    • At least with Serif products they will all open each others files eg Affinity Designer will open .afphoto files. This is not the case with Adobe products. Makes for an easier streamlined workflow IMHO.

    • Hey Scott,

      Yeah it does, everything from Arial to wingdings. I’ve used Affinity for 3 years now, alongside Capture One Pro, as I’m a Phase Certified Professional. I found the switch from photoshop to affinity seamless. Its Macros are a bit underdeveloped compared to Photoshop Actions. So far I’ve saved 3 years worth of subscription fees, and used the money to buy Designer and Publisher. Hope this answer helps.

  10. I learned Photoshop and used it a lot for work. Once you are used to its ways, it just seems easier to stay with it rather than take on something new. That said, I cannot justify the cost of Adobe for the odd thing that I do at home where I may want to adjust a photo or create a poster. I don’t believe in pirating software so I bought the Affinity bundle because it was good value and the programs are very capable. I hope Serif continues to develop new products (such as a competitor to After Effects) that will further the ability to divorce from expensive programs that one only uses from time to time but are still able to do the job well. I too have not been charged for any upgrades though I certainly would not mind an occasional small charge for major upgrades if that would keep the product improvements rolling along with perhaps investment in some new stuff.

  11. Being a long time user of Adobe I was wary that anything else could touch them. Having a quick go on Affinity I was pleasantly surprised and shocked at how cheap it was. I am definitely going to consider the switch.

  12. I am appalled by Adobe’s Creative Cloud, so much so that I am still using CS6. When I got an email offering me the wonderful opportunity of “saving” money by buying a discounted version of the Cloud, I replied, angrily accusing them of extortion. The Adobe applications I need are Photoshop, Illustrator, and Acrobat. None of the plans offer just those applications. I would have to pay $52.99 to get these applications month after month after month after… And then Adobe patronizes me by telling me that buying all 23+ applications, at least 17 of which I don’t want, is my “best value.” I have downloaded Affinity Photo, and am exploring it.

    My company uses the Adobe Cloud suite, and we have had issues with licensing, where the applications would not open because of supposed serial number issues. I can’t express how infuriating it is not having access to applications you have paid for because of Adobe’s greed.

    I’m considering buying a new Mac, and I’m pretty sure there will be compatibility issues between the OS on that machine and CS6, so I am seriously considering Affinity photo.

  13. I agree with the “locked” comment it is a major problem for me, I need a live filters so PS is my go to app with the “Robin Hood” .

  14. Affinity photo might be lacking some features of Photoshop, but PS also lacks some features that AP has like FFT denoise (to remove paterns when restoring an old photo for instance) Some features just work better such as Lighting effects is much better in AP. refine selections, the content aware healing brush or equivalnet is much better. Heck, even the common clone tool works better. Btw, luminosity mask is complicated in PS, but the alternative methods like bland options (there are more) work better in AP. I also get more pleasing results in AP with the grad tool in an adjustment layer. The other thing is that AP might be a little slower with large files (although I don’t have that experience), it is not as much of a memory hog as PS that takes up at least twice as much RAM

  15. I want to scan and reduce in size some old ink drawings, so I am looking for reduction that retains detail. I was interested in the capabilities of ‘Smart Object’ in Photoshop, having seen a demo on YouTube and it looks just what I need. My own copy predates this feature, Photoshop 6 – yes, that old! I have no idea when the smart object feature came in, whether I can actually buy versions of Photoshop with this feature or if there are other programs that have something that works just as well.

  16. Hi, Excellent site and articles. I have been taking photogrpahs for close on 60 years, progressing from a wet darkroom through to digital, and various apps. I had settled on Photoshop and Lightroom, I still use the old version 6. Then I tried Affinity having dabbled with the earlier Serif Photo product. I find Affinity is great and works very well with Lightroom, which I use for all my main editing work, and then into Affinity for anything special etc.
    Adobe have long ripped people off and when they went subscription only that was the end for me, it is too expensive for the home user, its about time Photoshop was given real competition and it has that in Affinity. Adobe would have been much better following Autodesk Fusion 360 CAD practice, where they charge business users but non-commercial home use is free.
    Microsoft is another going down the Adobe route, I guess there products had got to the stage where people were no longer prepared to pay for small upgardes, so now they have them locked into a subscription service. Nothing but Greed.

  17. Thanks for the article and these comments. I have been flip-flopping between PS and Affinity. I have the CS 5 version but many of the tools are crashing my efforts. Affinity seems to be moving ahead at the time.

    Thanks again for your efforts!

  18. This is so helpful. I’m a keen amateur with Over 20 000 images. I’ve used Adobe for more than 10 years and all my importing and file arrangements and key wording is done through Lightroom. What alternative could I use for this if I moved to Affinity for processing? Would I lose all my present processing and file systems?

  19. Hello from Paris, France,
    I found this site to be great and very well documented.
    I’m just an amateur photographer but have used Photoshop CS6 a lot. I do a lot of photo montages. I bought the expensive Photoshop CS6 software at the time. But in your excellent presentation, you forgot to mention this: Now that my Mac has switched to Mojave and Catalina, my Photoshop is no longer usable! A real scam from Adobe! So, just in case, I did a Copy Carbon of my High Sierra system before upgrading in order to use my Photoshop. But in fact, ever since I discovered Affinity Photo which can be bought for $ 30, I don’t touch Photoshop, which I don’t use at all anymore.
    Mainly, I find it great that Affinity Photo saves your undo history even after you close the image. And much more features.
    I can imagine quite easily that Adobe will not be able to continue to demand such outrageous monthly payments from amateur photographers. For me, Photoshop Elements is of no interest.
    So I say, long life to Affinity Photo!

  20. I’m not going to defend everything in PS vs. Affinity, but one thing you list is that PS is faster with larger files. I think this depends on how you define larger. I find that Affinity is much faster for saves etc. than PS on larger files if larger means many layers. This is even if I turn off compression in PS etc. which not only is still slower on said files than Affinity, but results in the expected bloated whale of a PS file (in my case hovering around 15GB).

    I’m sure it can be debated though which is faster for fewer layers and very high canvas pixel sizes though, but for my needs in terms of layer count Affinity is much better.

    And please, before the PS preference jocks jump in with telling me to adjust the caches and undos and all that mess, I’ve tried it. A) doesn’t help enough to make it worth it B) it’s 2020, why in gods name am I having to mess with this crap?

  21. Got to say as somebody who does family and portrait photography professionally I have not found anything that Affinity Photo can’t do that PS can. The frequency separation filter is excellent, and the blending options tool allows applying textures on portraits very easily without having to painfully mask off faces etc.

    I have found that I can follow most PS tutorials and replicate then in Affinity, eg Pix Imperfect YouTube channel.

    I know PS does 3D and video but as I don’t use these it’s not a problem.

    Coupled with Capture One they are a very powerful set of tools for any photographer, and their capabilities alone make them excellent alternatives to Adobe, irrespective of any price savings.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Item added to cart.
0 items - $0.00